• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Van Iwaarden Associates

Retirement Planning For Employers

  • Home
  • Public Sector
    • GASB 67/68 Pension Accounting
      • GASB 67/68 FAQs and Resources
      • Fire Relief Associations
    • GASB 74/75 OPEB Accounting
      • GASB 75 & OPEB Expertise
      • GASB 75 & OPEB FAQs
    • Discount Rates, Crossover, Agent Plans
    • Speeches & Articles – Public Plans
  • Private Sector
    • Plan Design
      • Defined Benefit Plans
      • Cash Balance Plans
        • Cash Balance Plan Case Studies
        • Cash Balance Plan FAQs
      • Profit-Sharing Plans
      • 401(k) Plans
      • 403(b) Plans
      • Retiree Medical Benefits
    • Actuarial Services
      • Cross Testing
      • Pension Plans
      • FASB Retiree Medical
    • Speeches & Articles – Private Plans
  • Blog
  • About VIA
    • Our Team
    • Offices
    • Get a Life!

October 12, 2011 By Jim van Iwaarden 2 Comments

Deferred comp plans: when they’re a great choice, and when they’re not

Nonqualified deferred compensation plans are a common feature of executive pay packages.  They’re a great choice in the right conditions, i.e. when:Which door to choose?

  • The executive’s share of company profits is very small, and
  • The executive is willing to shoulder the employer’s credit risk, and
  • Providing the benefits through a qualified plan would be too expensive.

But they’re not so great when any of these conditions are missing.  Let’s examine each in turn.

Small share of company profits:  Nonqualified deferred compensation isn’t deductible for the company until it becomes taxable for the executive.  If the executive is a substantial owner in a profitable enterprise, e.g. a law firm or medical group partner, any deferred income boomerangs right back as taxable profit.  In contrast, qualified retirement plan contributions are deductible for the company when they’re made, and not taxable to the employee until they’re received in cash.

Willing to shoulder the employer’s credit risk:  Funding vehicles like rabbi trusts can protect the executive from the employer’s unwillingness to pay, but not against its inability to pay.  In today’s economic environment where even large companies are struggling, this risk may be unacceptable.  Protection from both of these risks – and even from the executive’s personal creditors – is provided by a qualified plan.

Qualified plan too expensive:  This is usually the main reason for setting up a deferred compensation plan.  Qualified plans have many requirements that don’t apply to most nonqualified plans:  coverage, nondiscrimination, government filings etc.  But they’re more flexible than most people realize.  In a cross-tested profit sharing/401(k) plan, top executives can often reach the annual $49,000 defined contribution limit with a 5% staff contribution.  And if that’s not enough, a cash balance or other defined benefit plan can allow much higher deductions:  up to an additional $100k-200k per year.

So, are we biased toward qualified plans?   Oh, absolutely.  Nonqualified plans can be a great choice, but make sure you’ve maximized your qualified plans first.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Filed Under: 401(k) plan, Cash balance plans, Defined benefit plans, Defined contribution plans, Private pensions, profit sharing plan Tagged With: deferred comp, nonqualified deferred compensation, nonqualified plans, qualified plans, qualified retirement plan

Previous Post: « Now is the Time for Retirement Plan Decisions
Next Post: What’s Important for Plan Sponsors in IRS Hybrid Plan Notice 2011-85 »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bruce Brumberg says

    October 14, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    Some good short thoughts on nonqualified deferred compensation (NQDC) compared to qualified plans. I would say the main reason to do an NQDC plan is that the qualified plans have limits on how much you can contribute and how much income you can base the contribution on. For many high-earners, this is just not enough to put away for retirement. Plus NQDC plans can allow distributions when you’re still working.

    You might be interested in looking at an independent site devoted to nonqualified plans at http://www.mynqdc.com/.

    There is specific FAQ that goes through the comparison between qualifed and nonqualified retirement plan rules and flexiblity:

    How does NQDC differ from regular deferred compensation arrangements, such as 401(k) plans?

    link to it at: http://www.mynqdc.com/faqs/how-does-nqdc-differ-from-regular-deferred-compensation-arrangements-such-as-401k-plans/

    Log in to Reply
  2. Jim van Iwaarden says

    October 14, 2011 at 4:54 pm

    Bruce, thanks for your comments!

    Qualified plans do have the limits you describe, but they’re much higher than most people realize. With a base contribution of 5-7½% of pay for rank-and-file employees, deductions in excess of $200,000 are possible with a cash balance / profit sharing / 401(k) combination. See an explanation at https://vaniwaarden.com/cash-balance-plans.

    401(k)’s are qualified plans, so they’re deductible with a 2011 limit of $16,500 plus $5,500 catchup at 50 and above. A match or profit sharing contribution is needed to reach the $49k defined contribution plan limit. NQDC is unlimited but not deductible.

    Log in to Reply

You must log in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2023 · Northern Consulting Actuaries, Inc. d/b/a Van Iwaarden Associates. All rights reserved.